So, with that lengthy preface explaining why this conversation is taking place, I will turn it over to you to explain what these lines in the sky are that we have all seen.
There’s a sprayed particulate dispersion. There is no theory in this equation.
Bottom line is, when we have up-close film footage of these aircraft at altitude —KC-10s, KC-135s, C-17 Globemasters—with nozzles visible turning dispersion on and off. This is not quote condensation. Geoengineeringwatch.
Org is the only entity that has taken a NOAA flying lab, a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration flying lab, and top scientists to sample what these heavy aircraft are emitting at altitude. That sample was processed at Rensler Polytechnic. At New York, one of the world’s most renowned testing institutions, we found exactly what we knew we would: starting with aluminum nanoparticles.
Bioavailable free-form aluminum is toxic to all life, period. That element is named in numerous climate engineering patents as part of geoengineering.
Dispersion elements. So again, there’s no theory involved in any of this. What’s so incredibly Profound in this equation, Tucker? You have the entire global climate science community, governments all over the world, saying we need to put aircraft in the air immediately to disperse light-scattering particles, and we use the science terms at geogenwatch.org.
Because the chemtrails term is the instant marginalization term by design, if you bring that term up, any elected official won’t talk to you anymore, and the media will immediately marginalize you: solar radiation management, stratospheric aerosol injection, cloud albedo enhancement, climate engineering.
If we stick to the science terms, they can’t marginalize us. So again, this elephant in the sky that we are told is a conspiracy theory is precisely what the entire global climate science community says we need to deploy immediately to slow down the warming of the planet—its stated purpose is to deflect some of the sun’s incoming thermal energy.
We know these programs, not surprisingly, are making a bad situation worse, not better, and Tucker, they’re being used as a form of warfare. And we know that we have countries like Iran.
Constantly demonized, of course, as you well know, immediately after 9/11, we have the list of countries to be targeted, given to General Wesley Clark, a list that clearly existed before 9/11 even occurred. Subsequently, every one of those countries, every one of them, endured a once-in-1,000-year drought. Statistically, mathematically, that’s impossible without climate intervention operations, and we have the leader of Iran.
On the floor of the UN on film, on the record, stating NATO was cutting off their precipitation. We have Iranian top scientists recently stating NATO’s been doing this for 40 years, destabilize the food supply by destabilizing the rain, and you destabilize the population.
Resources: https://www.geoengineeringmonitor.org/about
English