Donald Trump’s relationship with neoconservatism is complex and often contradictory. While he has at times adopted policies that align with neoconservative goals, his overall approach to foreign policy and governance deviates significantly from traditional neoconservative ideology.
Areas of Alignment
1. Support for Israel:
– Actions: Trump has demonstrated strong support for Israel, a key tenet of neoconservative policy. This includes moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights.
– Neoconservative Praise: These moves were lauded by many neoconservatives who see unwavering support for Israel as crucial to U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.
2. Military Actions:
– Syria: Trump’s administration conducted missile strikes against the Assad regime in Syria in response to chemical attacks, a move that aligned with neoconservative views on intervening against oppressive regimes.
– Defense Spending: Trump increased defense spending, which is consistent with the neoconservative emphasis on maintaining a strong military .
Areas of Divergence
1. America First Doctrine:
– Isolationism: Trump’s “America First” approach is fundamentally at odds with the neoconservative belief in active global engagement and interventionism. He has frequently criticized the Iraq War, a hallmark of neoconservative policy under George W. Bush.
– Alliances: Trump has shown skepticism towards traditional alliances and multilateral institutions, which contrasts with the neoconservative view that these are vital to advancing U.S. interests globally.
2. Trade and Economic Policies:
– Protectionism: Trump’s protectionist trade policies, including tariffs and renegotiating trade agreements, diverge sharply from the free-market economics favored by neoconservatives.
– Global Leadership: His approach to international trade and economic policy often emphasizes bilateral deals and economic nationalism, rather than promoting global free trade and economic integration.
3. Foreign Policy Approach:
– Withdrawal from Conflicts: Trump has sought to withdraw U.S. troops from conflicts in Afghanistan and Syria, which contrasts with the neoconservative preference for maintaining a robust military presence abroad to ensure stability and promote democracy.
– Engagement with Adversaries: Trump’s attempts at direct engagement with adversaries like North Korea and his initial conciliatory stance towards Russia also run counter to the neoconservative strategy of applying pressure and promoting regime change.
Neoconservative Response to Trump
The response to Trump from the neoconservative community has been mixed. Some, particularly those who prioritize Israel, have supported his actions in the Middle East. Others, especially those who emphasize the importance of international alliances and global engagement, have been highly critical of his policies and rhetoric. High-profile neoconservatives such as Bill Kristol and Max Boot have been vocal in their opposition to Trump, highlighting the stark differences between his policies and traditional neoconservative principles .
In summary, Donald Trump’s relationship with neoconservatism is marked by both convergence and divergence. While he has adopted certain neoconservative positions, particularly regarding Israel and military spending, his overall foreign policy approach is far more isolationist and nationalist than what neoconservatism traditionally advocates. This has led to a fractured response from the neoconservative community, with support in some areas and significant opposition in others.